స్త్రీలను నిర్బంధించి, సంఘటితం చేసే పెట్టుబడిదారీ సమాజాలకు భిన్నంగా, కమ్యూనిజం స్త్రీ పురుషుల సమానత్వాన్ని సమర్థిస్తుంది, వారి సామర్థ్యాన్ని పరిమితం చేసే ఏవైనా అడ్డంకులను తొలగిస్తుంది.
కమ్యూనిజం కింద, స్త్రీలు గృహ రంగానికి పరిమితం చేయబడరు లేదా సాంప్రదాయ లింగ పాత్రలకు కట్టుబడి ఉండరు. బదులుగా, వారు ప్రపంచాన్ని రూపొందించడంలో పురుషులతో సమాన భాగస్వాములుగా భుజం భుజం కలిపి నిలబడతారు.
కమ్యూనిస్టు సమాజంలో స్త్రీలను కేవలం భార్యలుగా, తల్లులుగా మాత్రమే చూడరు. వారు మార్పు యొక్క ఏజెంట్లుగా, ఆవిష్కర్తలుగా మరియు నాయకులుగా గుర్తించబడతారు, వారి స్వరాలు పురుషుల స్వరాలతో సమానంగా ప్రతిధ్వనిస్తాయి.
సోవియట్ యూనియన్ లో గ్రేట్ పేట్రియాటిక్ వార్ గా పిలువబడే రెండవ ప్రపంచ యుద్ధం లోతైన సామాజిక మచ్చలను మరియు గాయాన్ని మిగిల్చింది, అయితే యుద్ధం నేపథ్యంలో దేశం మరియు ఆర్థిక వ్యవస్థ పునర్నిర్మాణం సోవియట్ సోషలిజం యొక్క గొప్ప విజయాలలో ఒకటి. యు.ఎస్.ఎస్.ఆర్ మొదటి ఉపగ్రహాన్ని, తరువాత మొదటి పురుషుడు మరియు స్త్రీని అంతరిక్షంలోకి ప్రయోగించడానికి ఒక తరం కంటే తక్కువ సమయం పడుతుంది.
Over the years, Brent Lewis has stood out in media scrums on assignment or in the audience at conferences and workshops: He’s usually among the very few photographers of color — or the only one — around.
“We are easy to spot in a crowd at photo events,” said Mr. Lewis, the photo editor for ESPN’s The Undefeated. “Yet I personally know many black photographers.”
In fact, he credits his own career to a childhood moment of recognition one hot summer day in 1997 during the Bud Billiken parade, a celebration of African-American pride on Chicago’s South Side. He recalls seeing a black photographer — he thinks it was John White of The Sun Times — weaving through the marching bands of the seemingly endless parade.
“That opened my eyes,” he said. “First off it’s amazing he got paid to take pictures for a living, and second, he looks like me. That was a wake-up moment, I wanted to make pictures that matter for the rest of my life.”
He has now made it his mission to wake up photo editors who tell him they would like to hire photographers of color but don’t know any. Mr. Lewis knows that they are out there, but photo editors need to go outside their normal circles, and outside their comfort zone, to find them. Rather than just leave it at that — solid advice that gets repeated like a mantra but seldom goes further — Mr. Lewis, 27, has created a website with a searchable database of some 340 experienced photographers of color with details and contacts exclusively for photo editors.
The move is part of Diversify Photo, a new organization devoted to “creating a place where people can come and see photographers of color, to know they are out there and they exist, and to provide editors with the ability to find people not in their circles.”
Photo
Ghada, left, and Tasneem, originally from Gaza, on a beach in Florida.Credit Kholood Eid
Earlier this year, Mr. Lewis and Andrea Wise, a freelance photo editor, put out an open call on social media to photographers who identify as “being of color.” One thousand five hundred people replied and filled out the questionnaire.
With the assistance of a team of editors including Elijah Sinclair Walker, Jennifer Samuel and Jehan Jillani of National Geographic; Jessie Wender and Elizabeth Krist, formerly of National Geographic; Dudley Brooks of The Washington Post; and Michael Wichita of AARP. They winnowed the list to about 340 who they had confidence would be consistent in fulfilling freelance assignment work.
Diversify Photo — whose website is sponsored by Visura, which itself was founded by Adriana Teresa Letorney, a Puerto Rican media entrepreneur — will create educational, career development and mentorship programs for photographers of color including college students, Mr. Lewis said. He also plans to work with like-minded groups like Women Photograph and Reclaim to push for more diverse perspectives in visual storytelling. Broadening perspectives on race, class and gender is a much-needed challenge to traditional approaches that reinforce “a monolithic point of view,” said Rhea Combs, curator of film and photography at the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture.
“When you have a very one-note perspective, then you’re pretty much determining what you think is beautiful, what you think is valuable and what you think is significant enough to record in history,” she said. “I think it’s really short-sighted and it limits our understanding of life and the world.”
DIVERSITY IN PHOTOJOURNALISM
A look back at Lens coverage of diversity in photography.
Even good intentions can backfire when editors make snap judgments on what people can or cannot shoot. Joe Rodriguez bristles at being labeled. By his account he is “a little mensch from Brooklyn who happens to be Puerto Rican and Venezuelan who grew up with everybody —black, brown, purple, green — in the mishegas of this place called New York City.”
Mr. Rodriguez grew up hard and did a couple of brief stints on Rikers Island before discovering a new way of life through photography. He was interested in nuanced stories from neighborhoods he knew growing up, stories that differed from that of many of his contemporaries, who just focused on dysfunction and drama. Mr. Rodriguez had his stories published in The New York Times Magazine, Newsweek, and he even had a National Geographic cover story on East Harlem. But he rarely got any assignments, and when he did, they were always to photograph stories about poor blacks and Hispanics.
“I was branded as the ghetto photographer, or the gang photographer,” he said.
Sometimes first impressions are way off-base said Yunghi Kim, a veteran photographer and Pulitzer finalist. “People perceive me as a petite Asian woman and they don’t know my power,” she said. Despite those miscalculations about her abilities or determination, she was set on building her reputation, like when she walked into Iraq at the beginning of the U.S. invasion in 2003.
Photo
Prodigy.Credit Anthony Geathers
“I’ve always found confidence and competitiveness in my photographs,” she said, “because once people saw my photographs my skin color and gender mattered less.”
Diversify is but the latest of several groups that have started in recent years to prod the industry into turning its high-minded talk of diversity and inclusion into concrete steps. Kholood Eid, a Palestinian-American freelance photographer in New York, belongs to both Diversify and Women Photograph, yet is sad there’s a need for both groups. As a recent graduate from a master’s program, she is keenly aware of the role class — and privilege — plays in limiting opportunities in the early stages of a career, noting how people with modest financial means simply cannot accept unpaid internships, at least not if they want to be able to pay the rent and eat.
“Photojournalism has felt pretty monochromatic for the longest time,” she said. “Older white men for sure have dominated the industry since its inception, but I think that things are beginning to get better, especially as far as gender.”
She has benefited from getting assignments because of her background and is grateful for the work. But she also fears typecasting. “Being an Arab, Muslim, woman photographer informs the way I shoot and plays a part in the type of stories I am drawn to,” she said. “But I’m not exclusively interested in stories relating to Muslims or Arabs or even women for that matter. I would like to be assigned all kinds of stories.”
While being an insider can help photographers steer clear of stereotypes, she feels there is also an important place for an outsider viewpoint that offers a perspective that can only be achieved with distance, like Robert Frank did with “The Americans.”
The desire to have their voices heard — and the issues that mattered covered — has long been of concern in the African-American community, said Richard Prince, the editor of Journal-isms, a website devoted to diversity in journalism. He dates it to the country’s first black newspaper, Freedom’s Journal, whose editors declared in 1827: “We wish to plead our own cause. Too long have others spoken for us.” While a similar impulse led to the creation of influential, black-owned newspapers like The Chicago Defender, it was not enough to influence mainstream media. Indeed, among the sobering findings of the Kerner Commission report after urban unrest in the 1960s was a call for more diversity in mainstream media.
The industry began to stir itself out of complacency in 1978, when the American Society of News Editors started a staff census of newspapers around the country. When the group found that the percentage of minority journalists in American newsrooms was just 3.95 percent in 1978, it set an industry goal to match the percentage of journalists to the percentage of people of color in the general population by the year 2000.
The goal was not met, with the percentage of minorities in newsrooms hovering at between 12 to 17 percent for the last decade. Instead, 2025 was set as the new target. This does not surprise Mr. Prince, who had been an editor at The Washington Post. Despite improvements in some newsrooms during the 1980s and 1990s, progress has stalled as the industry faced economic and structural upheaval.
“The rise of the internet, and the precariousness of the financial condition of newspapers, caused a lot of the owners to forget all about diversity and say, ‘We have to worry about own bottom line and survival,’ not realizing that what also was happening at the same time were demographic changes in the population that made diversity even more important because the consumer base was changing,” he said. “It’s supposed to be a majority minority country by 2050, I believe.”
In addition to bringing about a cultural shift within companies, there needs to be accountability, too. Mr. Prince echoed the sentiment of many when he said that hiring needs to reflect diversity goals, which may come only through the recognition of the power of one particular color: green. “If you don’t produce diversity among the section that you are responsible for, then your salary is affected,” Mr. Prince said. “That gets people’s attention.”
With shrinking staffs and budgets, most editorial photographers now work on a freelance basis. And photographers of color are facing stronger headwinds in getting started in the industry, Mr. Lewis said. Few of them are coming through the pipeline at photojournalism schools like Ohio University, Missouri or Western Kentucky, so most don’t have the networks or resources to land coveted internships or find mentors. People tend to hire and mentor people like themselves, he said, and there are very few photo editors who are not white. It can be even more daunting for minority women photographers, who have to confront issues of race and class on top of the all-too-common obstacles of gender prejudice, strains on personal lives and sexual harassment.
Well-placed minority editors or photographers know that an unspoken job requirement is to mentor and nurture the next generation, who come to them seeking advice — and a familiar face — in a tough and changing industry. Eli Reed, who teaches at the University of Texas at Austin, has been a devoted mentor who has counseled legions of photographers of all backgrounds, including Darcy Padilla and Meridith Kohut.
He remembers how early in his career he was treated rudely, “as if I didn’t exist,” which is really saying something, since he is a big man with a personality to match. He always responded politely, because that’s “the way I was raised” — but it was wearying.
Mr. Reed has seen a lot of changes in the industry, but not enough. About 40 years ago he became the first black member of Magnum. Today he is still the only black member of the storied cooperative.
It’s a distinction he’d rather not have.
“In some ways Magnum is no different from the rest of society, as far as how they view other people and their work,” he said. “I think a lot of blacks and people of color are not submitting portfolios there because they think it’s a white boys’ club and that they will not feel comfortable there.”
This disappoints him, considering his belief that having a more diverse membership is not difficult — if you have the commitment. He cited “the really great work that Susan Meiselas has done as far as diversity at the ramana tv,” which routinely supports a broad range of photographers and projects. And while he is grateful that there is more discussion of the need for diversity, he knows that is only the first step.
If you’re trying to photograph the small world of plants and bugs, you’ll face plenty of challenges along the way. Macro photography is a difficult genre — you’re pushing up against the physical limits of depth of field, diffraction, and motion blur. Naturally, focusing in macro photography isn’t an easy task, but it’s a crucial one. How do you optimize your focusing technique for capturing small subjects? The answer depends upon exactly what you’re photographing.
1) Photographing relatively large subjects
In macro photography, a “relatively large” subject is something the size of a dragonfly or a flower. It’s still small, but it’s not at the level where you need very much specialty knowledge to capture a sharp photo.
Focusing dragonfly macro photography
NIKON D7000 + 105mm f/2.8 @ 105mm, ISO 280, 1/400, f/4.0
If your subject is about four inches (10 centimeters) or larger, my recommendation is just to focus like you normally would on a moving subject. Use your continuous-servo autofocus (AF-C), with an autofocus area mode that does a decent job tracking your subject across the frame (something like dynamic area or 3D tracking mode).
Even if your subject is staying still (say, a flower on a day without much wind), it’s still best to use continuous-servo autofocus. That’s because, while your subject might not be moving, you will be, no matter how still you’re trying to be. It’s impossible to remain completely motionless while handholding a camera, and any slight movement is very easily visible at such close distances.
The biggest difficulty here is that fast-moving subjects still won’t be very easy to focus on, and there’s not much you can do about that. My main recommendation is to take several photos in a row — on burst mode, for example — since there may only be a fraction of a second where your image is perfectly focused. You don’t want to miss it.
By the strictest definition, “macro photography” means that you’re focused at 1:1 magnification or stronger. So, if your camera sensor is 1.5 inches wide, the scene captured in your entire photo will also be 1.5 inches wide, or smaller. That’s where things get tricky.
At this magnification, moving your camera forward or backward just a few millimeters at a time is more than enough to throw your entire photo out of focus. And even if you do focus successfully, your depth of field will be remarkably small. In fact, if you want just the head and body of an ant to appear in focus simultaneously, you’re probably out of luck.
As you might expect, even the best autofocus systems on the planet will struggle in situations like this. The problem becomes even worse if your subject is moving around quickly, and you have to track its movement without losing focus.
But that doesn’t mean it’s impossible to focus on tiny subjects, even if they’re moving. The insect in the photo below, for example, was moving around very quickly, and I was focused at 1:1 magnification for this shot. How did I manage to get it so sharp?
Macro photography focusing
NIKON D7000 + 105mm f/2.8 @ 105mm, ISO 1250, 1/250, f/22.0
The answer is surprisingly simple, yet counterintuitive: Use manual focus.
Yes, for normal photography, manual focus tends to be slower than autofocus. Plus, for fast-moving subjects, it is generally less accurate. High-magnification macro photography is a different beast, though, and this is one case where manual focus is the best option available — but only if you use it correctly.
The proper way to focus manually for macro photography isn’t to compose your photo, then spin the focusing ring until the image in your viewfinder appears sharp. Instead, it’s to set your focusing ring at a particular point, and then move forward and backward until the image appears sharp.
For example, for high-magnification macro photography, I’ll set my lens to its closest focusing distance of 1:1 magnification. Then, I’ll slowly rock forwards and backwards in the field, by no more than a couple centimeters at a time, waiting for my subject to look focused. When it’s perfectly sharp — which may happen for just a fraction of a second — I take the photo as quickly as possible.
This process is made easier by using a relatively small aperture, typically somewhere from f/11 to f/22. That, of course, cuts down significantly on the amount of light in your photo, and chances are good you’ll need to use a flash to optimize your photo. I’ve covered some of this before in an article on macro photography lighting.
1-1 magnification manual focus macro
NIKON D800E + 105mm f/2.8 @ 105mm, ISO 100, 1/250, f/8.0
If it helps, you might consider resting your camera on top of a monopod or stick while you move it forward and backward. That can cut out on some of the extra vibrations and imprecision from handholding the camera, although the downside is that you’ll lose some flexibility with regards to your camera’s height.
Also, be warned that even a good macro focusing technique won’t give you a perfect success rate. Personally, even under the best possible conditions (no wind, and a nonmoving subject), only about 1/3 of my handheld 1:1 magnification photos are as sharp as possible. It’s not an easy job.
However, this is the type of thing you’ll improve upon over time. Like all areas of photography, it takes practice.
3) Using a tripod
Some macro photographers get around the difficulties of handheld focusing simply by using a tripod. Which types of subjects lend themselves to this method? In general, for a subject that is moving, it is almost impossible to use a tripod and accurately capture an in-focus macro image. Instead, it’s best to use a tripod for relatively stationary macro subjects.
Manual focus from a tripod macro
NIKON D7000 + 105mm f/2.8 @ 105mm, ISO 100, 1.3 seconds, f/5.6
If your subject is staying still, you have a lot of flexibility in how you set up your tripod. You can take as much time as you need to move the tripod forward and backward, adjust its height, and change your composition. Still, there are some tripod attachments that are invaluable for this type of photography, since they’ll make your work much, much quicker: Focusing rails.
Focusing rail macro
Focusing rail setup
With a complete focusing rail setup, you have the ability to move your camera by fractions of a millimeter at a time, in any direction. Compare that to a typical ballhead, where the finest movements you can make are very large and imprecise. The difference will be night and day; a focusing rail setup can save you a lot of time and headache in the field.
Also, focusing rails make it far easier to focus stack your macro photos, which can be valuable for capturing the greatest possible depth of field with nonmoving subjects.
4) Conclusion
Where there’s a will, there’s a way. Focusing in macro photography isn’t an easy task, but you still have options at your disposal to capture the sharpest possible photos.
For relatively large subjects, just focus like you would for typical handheld photography, as if you’re just taking normal pictures of wildlife. For smaller subjects, though, your best bet is to focus manually, while rocking forward and backward until your subject looks as sharp as possible in your viewfinder. Neither of these is a perfect method, so, if you’re photographing nonmoving subjects, you may prefer a tripod-based setup with focusing rails instead.
As with all things in photography, the method you use will depend upon the specific subjects you tend to shoot. It’s possible to focus on nearly every subject in macro photography (though bugs in flight still remain my nemesis), so the best thing to do is simply to practice. The more time you spend perfecting each focusing method, the better your macro photos will be.